The real reason Labour refuses to tackle the rape gangs

The so called ‘grooming’ (aka 'rape') scandal, involving the mass grooming and sexual abuse / exploitstion of vulnerable young girls, many in the ocial care system, by gangs of predominantly Pakistani men has been exposed in the public domain for two decades now, since Anne Cryer, then MP for Keighley in Yorkshire first spoke publicly of what was going on in her, and neighbouring constituencies is the most grotesque example yet of Labour’s abandonment of the working class in favour of virtue signalling appeasement of alien minorities.

 

Tony Blair would probably have called it a good day to bury embarrassding news. A more honest person would describe it as the day the Labour Party surrendered any pretence of being the party that speaks for the working class and admitted they are just a bunch of power - greedy grifters. Just 45 minutes before the UK parliament broke for recess yesterday, Labour safeguarding minister, the thoroughly amoral Jess Phillips announced a further watering down of an already very weak batch of local inquiries into the decades old scandal of Pakistani rape gangs operating unchecked in British towns and cities. Perhaps they hoped Elon Musk would be too preoccupied with the trade war to fire up his X account.

Concerned British citizens were promised, in January, five local inquiries in areas where the gangs were known to operate, after Labour rejected calls for a full-blown national inquiry complete with statutory powers. Now, there will only be one local inquiry, in Oldham, while other councils will be offered more ‘flexible’ – that is, even more toothless – alternatives. We are decades into this scandal now, and betrayal is still being piled upon betrayal.Is it any wonder the public are sick of mainstream politicians and are turning to fringe and even extremist alternatives?

(UPDATE: a public opinion backlash later forced the government into a U turn and the announcement of a full inquiry into the mishandling of the grooming and rape gangs cases,, though at the time of writing, only weeks later, there are signs Primie Minister Starmer and his cohort of crooks and liars are trying to wriggle out of the committment,) 

Yes, it’s been more than 20 years since Ann Cryer, then Labour MP for Keighley, West Yorkshire, first raised the alarm about groups of predominantly Pakistani Muslim men preying on poor and working-class white girls in her constituency, only to be dismissed as a racist.  In parliament, Tory MP Robbie Moore, Cryer’s successor in the conituency, was apoplectic. He’s long been calling for a Bradford-wide rape-gang inquiry, only to be rebuffed by the local authority. Why does the government think a looser, seemingly opt-in, approach will force Bradford Council, or any other council, to act, he asked, given they have a vested interest in keeping the truth hidden?

Why indeed. You could be forgiven for thinking Labourites would rather this issue was kept under the carpet, maybe because that’s where they’ve been keeping it for 20 years – even as one town after another, more often that not with a Labour MP and a Labour-run council, was exposed as the setting for the organised rape, drugging, trafficking, mutilation and murder of some of the most vulnerable people in society.

Rotherham, Rochdale, Telford, Oldham, Huddersfield, Newcastle. The list goes on and on. GB News reporter Charlie Peters identified at least 50 towns scarred by these largely Pakistani rape gangs. We’re talking about thousands upon thousands of victims, spanning generations. Even those five local inquiries, unable even to compel witnesses to give evidence, were an insult given the scale of this horror. Now, the survivors – beyond Oldham, at least – won’t even be getting that.

And why? Simply because the University brainwashed apparachiks in the public sector (the civil service, NHS, education, police, legal system and the media refuse to accept that a dark skinned person can do wrong. Even to suggest such a thing to the woke wankerati is to risk being branded racist and hounded out of a csreer or profession and turning into a social pariah. 

The local reports we have had over the years tell a chillingly similar story – not only in terms of the background of the perpetrators and the background of the victims, but also of the response. The silence. Local authorities refused to act out of fear of accusations of racism, or even sparking ‘race riots’. Raped children were dismissed by police as drugged-up slags. Here were the wrong kind of victims, and the wrong kind of perpetrators. And they were all across the country.

Labourites’ refusal to address this issue propely is not just about political chicanery. They would rather Labour councils were not held to account for their complicity and negligence in such a gross outrage of course. They are terrified by the genuinely racist conviction that tackling the rape gangs and belatedly delivering justice for the victimes of systematic abuse might ‘alienate’ voters in inner-city, predominantly Muslim areas – as if Pakistani Brits aren’t also appalled by what has been going on in the shadows of their communities.

In fact the government's aversion to challenging the Islamist belief that they are accountable only to sharia law and British law does nt apply to them is much deeper than that. Labour is lost to an ideology that is obsessed with looking good and thus is incapable of doing good.

It is clear now to many of us that the priority of ost politicians across all main parties is protecting their image as the champion of woke, virtue signalling and the promotion of multiculturalism and diversity is more important than protecting children from rape. Such thinking cannot comprehend the needs of victims when they do not conform to their prefabricated hierarchy of victimhood which is based on identity,race, religion, sexual preference and disability. Is it any wonder that a politician or public servant committed to this 'oke' philosophy thinks the truth is a dangerous thing, because the plebs can’t handle it, or believes the working classes are ineducable,xenophobic racists. This explains why our elite has jettisoned class politics for identity politics.

The grooming-gangs scandal is the most grotesque example yet of Labour’s abandonment of the working class. Of the subjugation of working-class people’s interests – their traumas, in this case – to the supposed electoral interests of the party and the multicultural, globalist ideologies of the new  far left elites. And it’s all derived from a deep-seated fear of ordinary people, white British and Pakistani British alike. 

FROM THE ARCHIVE:
 

It's Time Politicians Were MadeTo Admit The True Effects Of Mass Migration
Whenever the issue of mass migration is raised in public, most politiciansa probably explain the relationship between immigration and growth. But I’m not going to do that, not least because even the country’s leading economists can’t seem to agree on which is the best though none will admit that mass immmigration by low skilled, poorly educated labourers to a country with a high tech economy and a shortage of skilled and professional workers can only be negative.

Islamists Are Slaughtering Thousands of Christians But the Media Don’t Tell Us
If 16.2 million Muslims been forced to leave their homes in sub-Saharan Africa due to violent persecution by Christians, we can imagine the news coverage by Western nrews media organisations such as the BBC or The Guardian would feature video reports by excitable talking heads or prited headlines taking up half a page about racism. There would be no effort to be objective or present a balanced view, the two sides in the conflict would be clearly lablled

The Left is lying to itself, it needs limited migration as much as the Right does.

When Santiago Abascal, leader of Spanish right-wing party Vox, delivered a press conference on the 30th August, it did not take long for perhaps the most controversial part of his speech to be put into bite-sized form. Europe does not have moral duty to welcome or accept every Afghan or African

who seeks to enter.

Why Accepting Illegal Immigrants Is Not Going To Help Them
Celebrities, 'influencer', woke idiots and far left political groups are creating a chorus of catawauling complaints about the deportation of illegal immigrants who are crossing The English Channel from France in increasing numbers. But will accepting them only encourage more to come and be exploited by people trafficking ccrime gangs? This article lifts the lit on the illegal immigrants racke

Worlds Biggest Luxury Liner To Be An Immigrant Hostel?
Ocean Gala, a luxury cruise liner which when launched was the world’s largest passenger ship will be converted into a concentration camp floating hostel to house Sweden’s third world migrants. The only thing that may derail the deal with US Shipmanagers for floating migrant accommodation, would be failure to find a berth in any of Sweden’s large deep water harbours. Sweden’s open doors immigration policy has led to ...

Christians, Gays, Women Fleeing European Asylum Centres After Persecution By Muslim Men
In the case of Europe's immigration crisis, much of the fear and loathing is being caused by Muslim males. Most Europeans do not have a problem with foreigners or dark skinned people who are willing to obey the laws and accept local customs and traditions. And one tradition we in the nations that emerged from European cultures is the common understanding that if a woman goes out alone, with arms and legs showing and face and hair uncovered, it does not mean she is up for having rough sex

Are The Ruling Elites waking Up At Last To The Problems Cause By Mass Muslim Immigration?
The WEF had been dubbed Bilderberg Lite, a meeting to which the public (assuming they can afford £$€stupid for a cup of very mediocre coffee) is talking about a different matter this time round. Europe's immigration crisis and the similar though not so immediate problem in the USA, and the likely consequences for the economies of the developed world is top of the agenda.

Mainstram Media Finally wake Up To Migrant Crisis
In a move that will leave many of its shocked and disoriented, The Sun, the tabloid of tits and trivia today woke up to the immigration crisis that is threatening the social stability of European nations and reported some real news.

Anti Muslim Feeling Spreads Through All Levels Of German Society
We look first at the social problems Chancellor Merkel's 'Open Doors' immigration policy is causing in Germany, and further down the page as the political crisis Mrs. Merkel appears to be creating for her government.

London gangs ‘pressuring 9yo girls into group sex’ – UK Home Office report
A new report from the UK Home Office, the government department that deals with law and order reveals that the street gang culture imported along with these illegal immigrants has led to girls as young as nine unlucky enough to live in areas 'controlled' by these gangs are being sexually exploited and forced to service multiple men, after being groomed to think such behaviour is 'normal'.

Germans Demand Impeachment Of Hausfrau - Volksfuhrer Merkel
It has taken an example of lawlwss behaviour by recenltly arrived immigrants as gross as the mass rape and sexual assault riot in Cologne at New Year, 2016, to awake German anger at what their government, led by arch globalist Angela Merkel, is doing to the ancient cultures of the federal states that make up modern Germany.

Sharia courts creating dual justice system in UK?
As if we did not have enough immigration problems to deal with as the inflow of illegal immigrants (or refugees and asylum seekers as our ruling elites insist on calling them) shows no sign of slowing. from RT.uk:

New Year's Eve, Germany: 1,000+ Migrants Brawl, Rape, Sexually Assault, And Steal At Cologne Railway Station
Details of the sexual assaults and attacks on peaceful Germans by large gangs of migrants in Cologne in the early on the morning of January 1, are just now emerging. Not a word on this story was printed in mainstream European newspapers or reported in television and radio news bulletins.

Google, Facebook and Twitter Yield to German Govt Demand to Censor Anti-Migrant ‘Hate Speech’ (aka Free Speech)
Over the past couple of days we, and many other New Media outlets reported the horrific incident in Cologne, Germany at New Year, in which a crowd on male, recently arrived immigrants, all of Arab or North African appearance according to witnesses carried out a mass attack on German women who were simply trying to use the railway station.

German Anger Boils Over: Shots Fired At German Refugee Home; One Asylum Seeker Hit

Many may have forgotten because of all this - if only temporarily - about Europe's biggest crisis at the moment: the onslaught by over one million refugees, who are desperate to escape from the political disaster that are the result of western interference in the domestic politics of middle eastern countries like broken states of Syria and Iraq.

Sweden's Migrant Crackdown Could Spell The End Of Open Borders Across Europe
As we have reported many times over the past year, Sweden has been more hard hit by the crimes and lawlessness of illegal immigrants from primitive third world societies than anywhere else in Europe. Even the Sweden hating socialists cannot ignore the epidemic of rape crimes, assaults and the general contempt for Swedish society, law, culture and traditions that illegal immigrants from Africa and the middle east have expressed through their actions.

Even The Guardian Now Admits Immigration Depresses Wage Levels
The growth in wages for UK workers is set to remain stagnant, running parallel with inflation at just two per cent next year. This is due to the large number of migrant workers waiting to fill vacancies, as anyone with two or more functioning brain cells was aware and even the loony left newspaper The Guardian has now admitted.

EU Report Reveals Continent Being Changed By Migration While political leaders and the mass media constantly preach of the economic benefits and cultural enrichment that sping from mass immigration,EU Report Reveals Continent Being Changed By Migration just a few days ago we reported a study that found the economic benefits are a myth and today a report published by the EUs in house statistical bureau reveals immigrants have an adverse effect socially and culturally.

London Cop Confirms Donald Trump UK Radicalisation Claims

When Donald Trump, currently frontrunner in the contest to be Republican Party candidate in the USA's 2016 Presidential Election, in a campaign broadcast commented that Islamisation of the west has gone so far parts of London are so heavily populated with Muslim extremists there are now no go zones for police and emergency services, he was attacked by politicians and the mainstream media.

 

 

A Lack of Boundaries and Social Justice Warriors, an Analysis

by Tamara Kane

While reading “Boundaries with Kids” by Dr. Henry Cloud and Dr. John Townsend, I realized how many of the issues the 'woke' brigade, (progressives, liberals,social justice warriors etc.) have are due to parenting without boundaries and a lack of internal self-control and need for attention in the SJWs themselves. Let’s look at the issues the “Boundaries” books describe when someone lacks boundaries and the behavior of SJWs.

“If you grow up with confused boundaries, you cannot control yourself and therefore try to control others.” SJWs claim that they have the right to control others, whether censoring word choices, clothing choices or opinions that others hold. The end result is a totalitarian ideology that sees no limits in what it can demand, no matter how petty or personal. It doesn’t recognize boundaries that others may set. This may or may not be reinforced by the high correlation with diagnosed anxiety disorders Dr. Jordan Peterson of the University of Toronto found in social justice warriors that is absent in classic liberals, though both share the language and measure of morality based only on perceived fairness and empathy."

Social justice warriors were not raised with proactive boundaries, so they see only boundaries others, unfairly in the SJWs view, place that are reacted to – when they find any kind of resistance, whether a “no, I don’t believe that” or “I won’t change what I’m doing”, their reaction is outrage like a young child told NO. They blame the person who sets the boundaries or refuses to go along with their ever-changing, emotionally based demands for triggering it, just as an older child blames the parent for the tantrum or damaged items thrown in response to being refused.

When someone lacks internal self-control and a proactive mindset, they feel like they are victims of external sources of pain and restriction. They feel oppressed and helpless. Liberal political leaders harness this by saying, “Here are the identities of those oppressing you, hate them, I will help you, help me tear them down and destroy what they built to make things fair”. The unsolvable problem for the perpetual victim is solved by the manipulative liberal leaders who say the solution is tearing down whatever they point at. The perpetual protests are another symptom of this mentality, since protesting identifies a problem but does not solve it. They are protesting in the hope that those in power will solve it; they are like crying children assuming adults will fix the problem they cannot quite define just to stop the crying.

Per Dr. Cloud, immaturity is defined as not understanding the difference between caring and protecting. Caring is telling the truth, including reporting a criminal to the police and pointing out that one’s actions are wrong. Protecting is lying to protect the person regardless of the criminality or immorality of their actions. Liberal social justice warriors say that caring via correction is immoral, that judging an action wrong and enforcing consequences is in and of itself evil. They think that “don’t judge me” and “you’re on my side, you have to side with me no matter what” is the definition of love, though it is actually the opposite.

Liberals define boundaries as bad. They even apply this to international politics by saying there should be no national boundaries, standards or rules. In reality, it is incredibly lacking self-awareness since they are demanding the right to exclude people who disagree from high paying jobs, positions of authority or their presence. The end result is a double standard they think is moral and fair, that others’ boundaries are unfair and immoral while any boundaries they set are fine, even if exclusionary and enforced by violence.

There is a difference between hurt and harm, just as there is a difference between words and violence. Hurt is when you tell someone no, ground a child for breaking things on purpose, revoke privileges. Harm is beating a child with a belt, refusing to feed them, letting the child get electrocuted because you cannot bring yourself to hurt their feelings by saying no, you are not allowed to touch that, enforced by a swat to the hand. 

Social justice warriors engage in the ultimate confusion of hurt and harm by equating hurt feelings with violence, such that disagreeing with them is seen as a literal slap in the face, justifying any blows they throw at the speaker for daring to disagree.

Children raised with healthy boundaries and developed internal controls are capable of proactive boundaries, acting based on their internal values instead of external manipulations. Immature children and adults who only operate based on reactive boundaries can only say what they are against, what they hate. Against patriarchy, against whiteness, against systemic oppression, against Trump. The SJW is able to vaguely say they are in favor of love, tolerance, rationality, education only in the most general sense. However, that answer is disingenuous because it applies these positive words to the ideology no matter how hateful, intolerant, irrational or contrary to the evidence the group’s actions are. The ability to say “I’m for love” while hating the heretic who uttered hate facts contrary to your narrative and calling for violence against the evil ones who refuse to do whatever you’re demanding they do based on today’s ideological checklist is cover, not truth.

Tom C. Purcell Added Jul 3, 2017 - 8:07pm

Follow Me

We have none of those three.  Society; upside down and crooked.  Community;  which one?  No real sense of community.  It's hard to tell who speaks English anymore, let alone relate to any semblance of accepted normalcy amongst parents.  Civility;  I think of 1950s America, not modern America.  I think of cherry Chevrolets, apple pie, male and female roles as accepted within the community, barber poles, employed men, no dirty looks from neighbors that always smell like curry, no Russians, Mexicans, Arabs and Iranians that "Took our jobs!"  ;).

Nothing against other nationalities, but what about Americans?  Why are the multigenerational Americans that fed, defended, paid taxes and whos ancestors are buried on U.S. soil, the ones to be marginalized?

 

 

Tamara Wilhite Added Jul 3, 2017 - 8:13pm

Follow Me

Harvard scientist Robert Putnam found that diversity hurts civic life, reduces social trust, decreases public participation. Taken further, it pushes tribalism / grouping when the minorities are large enough to form their own enclaves.

The oldest of political realities is that people are most tolerant of those who differ from themselves when they live among those who do not differ, and when they do not fear having alien ways pressed upon them. This recognition is what enabled history's great
ecumenical empires to survive in peace.
Libs may learn that cities supporting school prayer or are anti-abortion could also become 'sanctuaries'
http://jewishworldreview.com/0617/codevilla061917.php3

 

 

Jeff Jackson Added Jul 4, 2017 - 7:37pm

Follow Me

Nice article Tamara. We have people who are taught to look for any slight, intentional or not, and make some kind of a case of it. I am certain that if I look for a slight hard enough, I'll find it. The term "microaggression" has become a college requirement, and anything can be made into a slight if you look hard enough, and the looking only creates more division, but that's what the people who teach microaggression and looking for anyway, division.

JJ Montagnier Added Jul 5, 2017 - 6:04am

Follow Me

I enjoyed reading this article, Tamara. This explains a lot about SJW's and many millennials in general (no offence to millenials in general, but its a fact). It makes one wonder what had happened within the general model of parenting in society that caused this phenomenon (of course its not only parenting, but boundaries can only be instilled by parents and educators) for a large part of a generation to show some of these traits.

Ian Thorpe Added Jul 5, 2017 - 11:10am

Follow Me

A lot of truth here Tamara, I've often tried to point out to the Social Justice Warriors that justice is a chimera and often by delivering justice for one person or group, we heap injustice on another.
That's too complex an idea for people who are driven by their need for peer approval of course.

Tamara Wilhite Added Jul 5, 2017 - 12:31pm

Follow Me

Thank you, Ian. They aren't driven by the need for peer approval. They are actually trapped in the childhood phase of "I'm happy, good, I'm sad, bad, I want it, it is my right, I don't like it, ban it, what I want to do is my right, what I can't do is a violation of myself". They react to boundaries as if it is an affront to their existence, a violation of their sacred selves - and react like toddlers told no for the first time with screaming, violent tantrums.

 

 

Do Vaccines Really Reduce Childhood Mortality and Extend Life Expectancy? A Critical Examination of the CDC’s Claims

 

Are vaccines as good as government offiials and medical professionals would have us believe? A critical evaluation of CDC's report on the effects of vaccines on children born between 1994 and 2023​. Without considering morbidity and mortality from vaccines, the report is at best vacuous. Read in full at Popular Rationalism on Substack

Recommended reading:

Health Tyranny Takes An Even More Sinister Turn

A study commissioned by the Health Secretary (presumably before the Labour government came to power,) the Darzi report said it had diagnosed the NHS woes, and Darzi himself wrote in the Guardian that his recommended solution to the stage 4 cancer of bureacraicioma is a “pivot to prevention” rather than continuing to treat sickness and injury.

RECOMMENDED READING:
Health Tyranny Takes An Even More Sinister Turn A study commissioned by the Health Secretary (presumably before the Labour government came to power,) the Darzi report said it had diagnosed the NHS woes, and Darzi himself wrote in the Guardian that his recommended solution to the stage 4 cancer of bureacraicioma is a “pivot to prevention” rather than continuing to treat sickness and injury.

MSM Journos Inadvertently Reveal Shocking Truth About Global Warming

In recent years, particularly around mid-July (the peak of the Northern Hemisphere summer), there has been a noticeable surge in headlines featuring the "hottest day" ever on record in corporate media outlets - which is of course pushed by climate alarmist journalists citing questionable studies. 

This timing coincides with hot weather, so naturally, it's quite convincing to persuade readers that the world's oceans are boiling and planet Earth will ignite into a fireball unless drastic actions are taken - such as more climate taxes, 'carbon credits,' banning cow farts, prohibiting new petrol-powered vehicle sales by X date, and pushing spending bills to procure more solar panels from China, to save the planet.

The problem is that corporate media only focuses on recent history - and not "in context" (as they love to say). Context is particularly important when it comes to climate change - as their narrative collapses when looking at a long enough timeline.

To wit... a funny thing happened when the Washington Post tried to map out half a billion years of global temperatures and the "disaster of global warming" ... Read full article >>>

 

Is trhe Tide Turning Against The New Normal

by Ian R Thorpe,November 8th, 2021

The winter 'flu season is upon us and that means the usual seasonal hysteria about the need to get vaccinated will be unleashed, again multiplied to the power of ten as the threat posed by what is for most of us a minor but inconvenient illness is linked to the similarly minor risk of COVID, the virus that has reduced the world to chaos for the past two years without killing very many people. toxic

Official figures show that COVID is not a serious threat unless you are very old, very sick or both, and recent news from Italy, where the official COVID death toll was recently reduced by 97% by eliminating all the fraudulent jiggery pokery used to inflate the death toll statistics and pump up the hysteria.

That’s right, as this blog has been telling you for the past two years, the pandemic of fear has little to do with any deadly virus, and the push to make us all accept injection with a shot of toxic shite that is not actually a vaccine because it does not confer immunity on those injected with it, (but may have serious, long term side effects though we are not allowed to discuss that,) it is the season for the global-capitalist ruling classes to whip the New Normal masses into a state of mindless mass hysteria over the imaginary apocalypse that they have used as an excuse to cancel Christmas for the last two years.

The vast majority of the Western world has been browbeaten into a  state of medieval serfdom by a pseudo - medical tyranny which demands we show your “vaccine - status papers” to access basic public amenities, attend theatres or sports events or go shopping. And yet the vaccines we are being bullied into accepting not only fail to provide immunity to the rebranded winter 'flu, they also do not prevent vaccinated people passing the virus on to other vaccinated people.

People who refuse to get experimentally “vaccinated” against a virus that causes mild-to-moderate symptoms (or, often, no symptoms whatsoever) in about 95% of the infected, and the overall infection fatality rate of which is approximately 0.1% to 0.5%, are being systematically segregated, stripped of their jobs, denied medical treatment, demonized as “a danger to society,” censored, fined, and otherwise persecuted in a scenario resembling the plot of the 1970s Donald Sutherland film Invasion of the Body Snatchers..

If you are thinking this souds like a but of anti - vaxxer hysteria generation take a look at the headline on this front page story from the Brisbane, Australia Courier - Mail newspaper…

 

Since the vaccine roll out began Australia, rather surprisingly for a country whose citizens have a reputation for being independent and having a healthy contempt for authority, has led the charge towards vaccine fascism, but it looks as if the neo - Nazi the Great New Normal Purge is on and the vaccine refusniks are the new Jews. “The Unvaccinated” and other infidels and heretics are being hunted by fanatical, hate mobs, dragged before the New Normal Inquisition, fired from jobs, excluded from social activity and made into pariahs all around the world.

In New Normal Germany, where outgoing leaders Hausfrau - Volksfuhrer Merkel has never been averse to a bit of authoritarianism when she needed to bring the masses to heel, popular footballer Joshua Kimmich is being publicly hung drawn and quartered for refusing to submit to being “vaccinated” and profess his faith in the New Normal World Order.A similar fate has befallen NFL footballer Aaron Rodgers is being hounded by the mob, even though he has contracted COVID (well, tested positive which is not quite the same thing as the test gives 80% false positives,) recoverred within a few days and now has better and longer lasting immunity that any of the vaccines provide.

Also n the USA, “the Unvaccinated” stand accused of murdering Colin Powell, an 84-year-old, cancer-ridden war criminal although as stated above, an unvaccinated person is no more likely to pass on the infection than a fully vacc.inated one as the 'vaccine' does not immunise.

Australia (uber alles?) is planning to imprison people and fine them $90,000 for the “crime” of not wearing a medical-looking mask, or attempted worship at a synagogue, or whatever. Another familiar tactic of the hysteria merchants is the pious emotional blackmail: we should show respect for the COVID dead by not questioning the difference between dying OF COVID and dying WITH COVID or speculating irresponsibly on social media about the effectiveness of the vaccines. This reminds one of the immense non-sequitur after 9/11 when one angry defender of the official account objected to the “truthers” by saying, “Don’t you know nearly three thousand people died that day?”

But what could be more respectful to the dead that to inquire into how they died? And what could be more disrespectful than to pervert the facts of their demise to serve a political agenda?

 It is also noteworthy that, just as some deaths are “hushed up” from the start, there are others loudly trumpeted but which then suspiciously vanish e.g. four year old Kali Cook from Galveston County, Texas, who died “of COVID”, this being blasted over all the media as proof that children are at risk and must be vaccinated with the clotshot as mainstream media fell over themselves trying to outdo each other in sensationalising this sad little story. But then there was a small headline  on the inner pages suggesting we don’t jump to conclusions till the autopsy. After which – nothing!

In Florida fanatical school staff tied a medical-looking mask to the face of a non-verbal Downs-syndrome girl with nylon cord, day after day, for over six weeks, until her father discovered what they were doing, proving once again that COVID derangement syndrome is a far more serious disease than COVID. Or maybe that you have to be stark raving bonkers to become a schoolteacher these days. However it has been encoraging to see that the story, once it was brokenm in alt_media has received fairly widespread coverage and drawn attention to they extreme actions of those who have signed up to the pandemic of fear.

The Internet is brimming with examples of similar cruel, sadistic and irrational behaviour by the vaccinated towards people who have refused vaccination. This alone should convince the unthinking herd creatures that there is something very strange going on. If you are vaccinated and the vaccines work, as our governments and medical professionals insist they do, why has any vaccinated person anything to fear from the unvaccinated.  If the vaccinated can get the vaccine from unvaccinated people (or other vaccinated people for that matter,) what is the point of being vaccinated.

The situation had to become too crazy to remain credible and there are signs even journalists working for far left news organisations are starting to smell a rat.

In a fascinating thread on Twitter two of the major CNN stars tentatively admitted that their rhetorical posture — everyone who dissents in any way from our decrees is racist and/or stupid — is alienating and ugly, but they didn’t realize this because they live in an “echo chamber” of like-minded liberals:

https://twitter.com/ShellenbergerMD/status/1455745884856078338

“Voters are being brow-beaten in being told they’re voting for racists. People do not believe that about themselves and do not believe that America is full of the hateful kind of people that McAuliffe & Biden told us Virginia was full of”

Van Jones: “Democrats are coming across as annoying and offensive and out-of-touch. I think there is a message here.”

Anderson Cooper. “It seems annoying to a lot of people”

The CNN thing is not explicitly about Covid or vaccines, but it is explicitly about a crisis of credibility for the mass media’s pundits, experts and pseudoscientists - on the pandemic, climate change, Chinese expansionism, the supply chain crisis etc..

Are mainstream media looking at their falling numbers and the likely knock on effect on revenue and responding to the public mood instead of trying to manipulate opinion? we starting to sense a shift here?

Besides the global rejection of the contrived COVID crisis, the smell of blood in the water over COP26 is attracting the attention of the media sharks who know their paying customers are fed up of endless repetition of propaganda narratives.

COP 26 failed when Xi announced he wasn’t attending, then Putin, then Modi of India walked in with a demand for $1tn or he’s not playing ball. This followed 22 smaller nations presenting US ambassador to the United Nations, John  Kerry with a bill for $750bn in unpaid money, promised over decades of COP promises of funds to help India clean up its act on CO2 emissions. To top it off 55 other countries are demanding money with menaces, threatening to abandon any further pretence of saving the planet by stifling their countries growth and sacrificing prosperity at the alter of the god Net Zero.

Boris had to travel to Westminster to face the Tory big guns of David Davis, Steve Baker, Graham Brady and Ian Duncan Smith, who have emerged at spokesmen for a large group of Conservative MPs who are appalled at the government's willingness to embrace the political philosophy of Cultural Marxism and to bypass parliament and rule by authoritarian decree. All of the aforementioned have already published media articles criticizing theohnson cabinet's NetZero policy. The dissent is likely to have have grown into a rebellion against the Prime Minister during his Glasgow sjourn.

COP26 was never going to be anything but a taxpayer funded jolly for tax - eaters and a chance for billionaires like Amazon's Jeff Bezos to show off their private jets even as they lecture the rest of us on how important it is to reduce our carbon footprint, no matter what sacrifices must be made both as individuals or communities. The low hanging fruit of the climate change effort was grabbed on day one with announcements of halting and reversing deforestation, promises that have been made in the past and never fulfilled.

There will be no meaningful decisions made, no significant agreements signed, no consensus on how to halt climate change, how can there be, the leader of the biggest emitter of CO2 boycotted the event. Weirdie - beardies will preach of the need to ban the internal combustion engine and switch to driving pimped up golf trolleys in spite of its becoming blatantly obvious that not only is there insufficient reserves of essential materials to make a set of batteries for the electric replacement for every vehicle currently on the road, but that control of most sources of these essential materials lies in the hands of 'difficult nations' such as China, Russia and their client states.

Biden’s £3.5Tn New Green Deal is already in trouble in Congress, and now Republicans are doing well in the US in local elections. If Biden doesn’t change course quickly on that and covid, when the 2022 midterms come round, he’ll wonder where all his support went, if he even notices.

Were there ever a covid crisis or a climate crisis, you can be sure this is it. The tipping point has been reached and political heads may well roll unless there is some enthusiastic back-pedalling. And you can bet we won’t be seeing much of XR and IB on the streets of the UK for much longer, they will only serve as an embarrassment to Boris.

It is, the perfect storm and it might yet sink The Great Reset, The New Normal and the push to establish a global authoritarian government.

 

Reports On The Ukranian Crisis Are Bollocks - Ukraine Is Not The Good Guy

 

On February 20th of 2014 the world was shocked by video footage of snipers firing on protesters in Kiev Ukraine. Twenty one people were murdered, and it was widely assumed that President Victor Yanukovich and his supporters were behind the attacks. However a phone conversation between EU foreign policy chief Cathy Ashton and Estonia’s foreign minister Urmas Paet leaked to the public on March 5th reveals that the snipers in were actually from the new coalition government, and that Western diplomats knew this and covered it up.

This report and embedded audio will provide evidence that the crimes against humanity committed in Kiev earlier this year were in fact committed by the new coalition government (puppet - masters of Zelenskyy the Clown,) and that officials in the E.U. and the United States knew full well who committed these crimes and that they are protecting and financially supporting the real criminals. But that phone call went on for quite a long time so here's a transcript of the most damning section.

 Urmas Paet: “All the evidence shows that the people who were killed by snipers from both sides, among police men and people in the street, that they were the same snipers killing people from both sides.”
Cathy Ashton: “Well that’s, yeah…”
Urmas Paet: “And she also showed me some photos and she said that has medical doctor, she can say that it is the same handwriting…”
Cathy Ashton: “Yeah…”
Urmas Paet: “Same type of bullets… and it’s really disturbing that now the new coalition, that they don’t want to investigate what exactly happened. So that there is now stronger and stronger understanding that behind the snipers, it was not Yanukovich, but it was somebody from the new coalition.”

For some reason mainstream media in the USA, European Union and NATO allies did not think the crimes of the US / NATO puppet regime were worth covering, in the same way as that have decided the thousands of deaths and serious illnesses related to COVID vaccines were not worth bringing to out attention.

Instead of reporting the truth about the Ukrainian regime western deep state  propaganda agencies spun an official narrative to be peddled corporate media that the new government were peaceful activists who only wanted a chance to join the European Union.

The real story is much more ominous. Far from being supporters of Yanukovich, it turns out that the snipers were working for the new government, most powerful and influential contingent of which is a coalition of self - confessed fascists and Neo-Nazis, and they aren’t peaceful. In fact they are extremely brutal.

Here is a recording of the leaked call between Ashton and Paet:

The most prominent among these groups is an organization called Svoboda. The Svoboda party which traces its roots to the Ukrainian partisan army of World War II, was loosely allied with Nazi Germany. Until 2004, Svoboda had been called the Social-Nationalist Party, a deliberate reference to the National Socialism of the Nazis.

We’re not throwing the term Neo-Nazi around as an empty slur here. The leader of Svoboda, Oleh Tyahnybok, has openly targeted Jews and ethnic Russians in Ukraine for many years. In 2004 he was kicked out of Viktor Yushenko’s government for a speech calling for Ukrainians to fight against a “Muscovite-Jewish mafia”, and in 2005 he signed his name to an open letter to the leadership of Ukraine entitled “Stop the Criminal Activities of Organised Jewry”.

And none of this was a secret. The BBC was already reporting on the danger that Svoboda’s rise posed back in 2012, and the EU passed a resolution that same year condemning Svoboda, as “racist, anti-Semitic and xenophobic”. Yet somehow the U.S. government thought it was appropriate to back these extremists.

Above are two pictures of Victoria Nuland from the U.S. State Department meeting with Oleh Tyahnybok. (Picture: Stormclouds gathering ) 

Why would the U.S. government work with Neo-Nazis?

Because they thought they could control the situation. They thought they could install their puppets behind the scenes and manipulate the situation in their favor.

This isn’t just speculation. That same Victoria Nulland who met with Svoboda in February was caught in another leaked phone call discussing who would they would put in power.

The U.S. government thought they could control this beast from recent history, but they were wrong. Svoboda and the Right Sektor are not toys to be played with. These groups are armed, they’re forceful, and they view this crisis as an opportunity to reshape Ukraine into the kind of tyranny their heroes from the fist half of the 20th century envisaged for the whole of Europe.

Apparently the U.S. government has woen up to the fact that their new best friends in Ukraine are not nice people, but instead of distancing themselves that are trying to cover up their stupidity and gullibility. In March a senior U.S. official told Reuters that “Since entering the Ukrainian Parliament in October 2012, the Svoboda leadership has been working to take their party in a more moderate direction and to become a modern, European mainstream political party, The leadership has been much more vigilant about expelling or otherwise punishing individual members who engage in xenophobic behavior or rhetoric.”

*****

So it’s ok to use known Neo-Nazi groups to topple a government as long as their leaders keep their people from saying anything stupid in front of cameras for a few months? The reality of the matter is that as ridiculous as this assertion makes Washington look, they are trapped. They can’t deny that Svoboda and the Right Sektor are running the coalition government when Svoboda holds five senior posts including the deputy prime minister position and the Right Sektor’s Dmytro Yarosh is now the country’s Deputy Secretary of National Secy.

But what about that dramatic video “I am a Ukrainian” that went viral as this crisis was unfolding. It was so compelling, so heart wrenching. Yeah, but who made it? Did you notice the link in the description? Awhispertoaroar… who are these people? Oh look, a link in the description. Let’s click it. They have a website and a behind the scenes section. Oh it list the film makers. Who’s this here? Larry Diamond, inspiration and executive producer. He’s also a member of the Council on Foreign Relations and the National Endowment for Democracy and an advisor for the U.S. State Department. You know the funny thing about the National Endowment for Regime Change Democracy is that even though they call themselves an NGO they get virtually all of it’s money from the U.S. federal government. You can verify this by downloading their annual financial disclosures. I’m sure it’s just a coincidence that the NED has been pouring massive amounts of money into Ukraine to “strengthen democracy and civil society”?

That sound nice doesn’t it? Democracy… civil society. Of course by now you’ve realized that when they talk about spreading democracy what they really mean is regime change, and they are willing to work with the most despicable elements when it’s expedient.

It’s exactly the same game they played in Syria. The U.S. government funded known extremists, literal terrorist organizations who have been documented massacring whole towns. They gave them money, they gave them weapons, and even after those extremists used sarin gas on thousands of civilians and got caught by the U.N., Washington still covered for them. Even to this day they are still funding those murderers, they are still training them, and they are still sending them weapons. There’s a word for this kind of activity: state backed terrorism.

But the situation in Ukraine didn’t unfold as planned. The parliament of Crimea, in the South of Ukraine voted to secede, and they are putting the decision up for a public referendum. The U.S. claims that this referendum is “unconstitutional” and says they won’t recognize Crimea’s decision as legitimate regardless of the outcome. So a foreign backed Neo-Nazi coup is constitutional, but a declaration of independence placed to a general vote is not? Seriously? That’s the best you guys can do? Who writes these scripts?

 

 

 

 

RELATED:

Has The Green Blob's War On Fossil Fuels Been Lost On The Battlefields Of Ukraine
With some energy sector opinion makers already pronouncing the 'net zero' agenda is already dead as oil and gas supplies from Russia dry up due to NATO / EU sanctions and Moscow's retaliatory export bans which have only been in force a week at the most, governments in the liberal democracies of Europe and North America are already talking about starting up redundant coal and nuclear power stations, the UK, Netherlands and other nations with offshore gas operations in the North Sea are suddenly finding that it may now be economically viable to start pumping again and (whisper it ever so quietly,) coal is coming back into the reckoning as an energy source ...

 We bring you news of research by the US Centre For Disease Control via www.resistthemainstream.org in its entirity because we feel it is something our mainly British and European readership need to be aware of. It is likely that after a few days in which we will research further information on this theme from Israel, Germany, France, Sweden and India this article will be replaced by a far more wide ranging piece on the failure of the vaccines to protect those who needed protection. Until then we hop the site managers of resistthemainsteam are not offended by our use of their material.

All Vaccinated People With Severe COVID-19 Had at Least 1 Risk Factor: CDC Study

January 7, 2022

Further research published by The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) on Jan. 7 reiterated that the COVID-19 vaccines protect recipients, while serious outcomes associated with the shots were seen in individuals who had risk factors.Every vaccinated individual who suffered serious outcomes as part of a study of more than 1.2 million people had at least one risk factor that left them vulnerable, the CDC said in its Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report (MMWR).The study defined serious COVID-19 outcomes as hospitalization with a diagnosis of acute respiratory failure, the need for noninvasive ventilation (NIV), ICU admission, including requiring invasive mechanical ventilation, and death.

The health agency studied approximately 1,228,664 persons aged 18 and over who completed primary vaccination from December 2020 to October 2021, receiving either Pfizer-BioNTech, Moderna, Johnson & Johnson, or an “unspecified mRNA vaccine.”

Among these, 2,246 contracted COVID-19, including 327 who were hospitalized, while 189 had a severe COVID-19 outcome, and 36 had a COVID-19–related death (including nine persons discharged to hospice), the CDC said.

Among those who acquired COVID-19 after primary vaccination, 36 died, 24 survived and were admitted to an ICU, and 129 survived but were diagnosed with acute respiratory failure or required non-invasive ventilation but were not admitted to an ICU.

The CDC said that severe outcomes associated with getting the vaccine are rare, with 0.015 percent of those who were studied having severe outcomes and 0.0033 percent of participants dying.

Those who suffered serious outcomes had risk factors which included being aged 65 and older, being immunocompromised, or having underlying conditions involving pulmonary disease, liver disease, chronic kidney disease, neurologic disease, diabetes, or cardiac disease.

All those with severe outcomes had at least one of these risk factors, and 77.8 percent of those who died had four or more risk factors, the CDC said.

“Vaccinated persons who are older, immunosuppressed, or have other underlying conditions should receive targeted interventions including chronic disease management, precautions to reduce exposure, additional primary and booster vaccine doses, and effective pharmaceutical therapy to mitigate risk for severe outcomes,” the CDC said. “Increasing vaccination coverage is a critical public health priority.”

Among 3,395 persons who received booster or additional vaccine doses, 27 contracted COVID-19, of which three had severe outcomes but this did not include ICU admission or deaths.

The CDC also noted that population-wide data has demonstrated that COVID-19 hospitalizations and deaths are more frequent among Hispanic, non-Hispanic Black, and non-Hispanic American Indian or Alaska Native persons than among non-Hispanic White persons.

This might be down to multiple factors, including higher levels of exposure to the virus, reduced access to care, and higher rates of uncontrolled underlying conditions among these populations, the CDC said. However, the agency has not found any association between race/ethnicity and severe COVID-19 outcomes after receiving the shot.

The study published Thursday was conducted before the discovery of the highly transmissible, although less severe, Omicron variant in South Africa in November.

The World Health Organization (WHO) said Thursday that worldwide cases of COVID-19 have “increased sharply” in the past week but the overall number of deaths dropped.

Between Dec. 27, 2021, and Jan. 2, 2022, the number of cases increased by 71 percent compared to the previous week, the agency said in its weekly epidemiological update, although it did not reference the Omicron variant. Meanwhile, it said the number of deaths dropped by 10 percent worldwide.

The figures come as Omicron continues to spread across the globe. This week, the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) reported that Omicron makes up about 95.4 percent of all COVID-19 cases, supplanting the previously dominant Delta strain.

RELATED:

Novak Djokovic is no victim but Australian government 's political opportunism is disgusting
While the world divides more deeply into two camps over the COVID mRNA vaccines, one of the most shameful incidents of the whole pandemic has been playing out in Australia where the world No 1 tennis player has been subjected to a medieval with hunt over his refusal to accept vaccination. The persecution of Novak Djokovic has been engineered purely because the nation's leaders want to put it at the forefront of the push towards global vaccine tyranny.
Continue reading >>>